![]() |
Boat Waiting |
There
are several definitions for "rule". Some are more stringent than
others. This word can instill some uneasiness in an artist. The
wrong solution is to buy into the myriad and ultra-importance of
all the rules without question and inflict it on self and others,
often to the demise of would-be artists, including oneself! No doubt
there are core skills worth learning: color theory, tonal values,
perspective, size relationships, et al. But beyond the basics,
arbitraries enter in and diminish ones one's creative abilities and
output, not to mention the joy of just creating!
What,
really, are these rules except guides toward better design and
composition, and thus create the right mood and message. A student
needs to be comfortable with a subject and its so-called rules so as
to have the needed deft and dexterity when applying them. Great skill
requires great practice, yes, but skill isn't all manual or physical. One must, as well, eventually acquire great understanding to achieve
ultimate mastery.
I
have a proposal. Let's look at these rules not as "supposed
to's", but as guides with levels of workability. Some things
applied in the creative process will work better than others in that
situation. In practice we have to use judgement and ask, "Did
that make it better or worse?"..."or just different?"
The more mastery you have with these guidelines, the better and
quicker you'll know. It will be instinctive.
So,
be enough relaxed about the "rules" that your creativity
can flow. Don't let them become your
shackles
of despair". But don't be so dismissive or rebellious that you
don't make good art. The Impressionists bucked the rules, but then
formulated new ones to better suit their art form. And, even
abstracts are guided by thought and planning.
Make good art, but enjoy the journey, too!
Make good art, but enjoy the journey, too!